Feature comparison

LumaDisk vs SimplyDiskSweeper

A Rust/GPUI analyzer with two maps, build-cache detection, and duplicate tools. A folder browser ranked by allocated space, with confirmed Trash removal. See how their platforms, views, and cleanup workflows fit the way you work.

Which fits your needs?

LumaDisk: Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery.

SimplyDiskSweeper: Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation.

Features, pricing, and workflow

Scroll across to compare

FeatureLumaDiskSimplyDiskSweeper
Best fitMac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery.Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation.
VisualizationSunburst, treemap, duplicate and unused-file listsSize-ranked folder hierarchy and filters
Platforms and requirementsmacOS (Apple Silicon), WindowsmacOS
Pricing and editionsSeven-day full trial; scanning stays free. Vendor lists $6.89 once for the remaining features.US Mac App Store lists $14.99 upfront; one-time purchase.
Open sourceNoNo
Native macOS UICross-platform interfaceYes
Cleanup workflowQueue selected items for removal; review the current app’s confirmation and recovery options.Moves only selected items to macOS Trash after confirmation.
Reports and portabilityThe cited page does not establish scan-report export. Preserve paths and selections before starting a fresh scan in NullDisk.The official page does not establish scan export. Keep useful paths before rescanning; permission scope can make totals differ.

LumaDisk: what stands out

A good fit for Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery.

LumaDisk: strengths

  • Sunburst and treemap with live scan updates
  • Build-cache radar, duplicate groups, and unused-file lists
  • OneDrive/Dropbox connections; iCloud through its local folder

Considerations

  • Verify Mac CPU support; current site highlights Apple Silicon
  • Features beyond scanning require an unlock after trial
  • Google Drive is listed as coming soon

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

SimplyDiskSweeper: what stands out

A good fit for Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation.

SimplyDiskSweeper: strengths

  • Largest accessible items shown first
  • Folder hierarchy browsing and filtering
  • Selected items move to Trash after confirmation

Considerations

  • Paid upfront rather than a free edition
  • Measures accessible items within the selected folder
  • Ranked browsing rather than a whole-drive graphical map

Full product guide → · Alternatives →

For a useful comparison on your own drive, match the scan root, access permissions, and size mode. Chart style changes how you explore the results; it does not by itself establish measurement accuracy.

Common questions

When should I choose LumaDisk?

A good fit for Mac/Windows users wanting maps, duplicates, and build-cache discovery. Seven-day full trial; scanning stays free. Vendor lists $6.89 once for the remaining features.

When should I choose SimplyDiskSweeper?

A good fit for Mac users who want a focused list workflow and explicit confirmation. US Mac App Store lists $14.99 upfront; one-time purchase.

Will both apps show the same size?

Not necessarily. Match the scan root, permissions, exclusions, and logical/allocated-size mode. Hard links, APFS clones, snapshots, sparse files, and cloud placeholders can change totals. A reported size is not a guaranteed amount recovered after deletion.

More comparisons